Sunday, August 22, 2010

911 Inside Job Chronicles

by Len Hart, The Existentialist Cowboy

Conan Doyle's character Sherlock Holmes said: "When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains however implausible must be the truth!" This must be too easy. The significance of this single sentence is apparently lost on several generations of Americans who will believe all kinds of weird stuff for which there is no evidence whatsoever.

Michael Shermer, for example, has made a living as a career 'skeptic' but on the topic of 911, his record is no better than that of the most gullible Americans who defend Bush's official conspiracy theory with more lies and violations of Occam's Razor. Like the average American, Shermer bought into at least two bald-faced lies advanced by the Bush administration. Shermer failed to apply the 'burden of proof''; he did not bother to question fatal contradictions that discredit the Bush administration as they, in fact, disprove the 'official conspiracy theory' of 911.

Only the guilty are sufficiently motivated to cover up a crime. By contrast, the innocent have nothing to cover up! In some cases, the innocent may be motivated to discover the truth even as guilty criminals work to subvert their efforts. The guilty, by contrast, are motivated to work covertly and/or overtly to cover up, hide evidence and/or lie! The innocent have nothing to hide but nothing to gain and, often much to lose, with lies and cover ups. Simply, the innocent have no motive to cover up anything.

Bush ordered physical evidence of mass murder and/or high treason destroyed. Bush opposed the creation of the 911 Commission and worked to subvert it when it was created. It was Bush who warned against 'outrageous conspiracy theories' when, in fact, it was his administration that offered up the most outrageous conspiracy theory of them all: a ludicrous story that reads like a re-write of Ala Baba and his 40 thieves. It is the pernicious legacy of 911 that it was exploited by Bush, the GOP, the U.S. right wing to silence dissent, to silence America.

If Bush covered up and/or obstructed the investigation of the crime of 911 in any way, then he is guilty of acts of obstruction of justice intended to hide the truth in ways that would protect him or his 'friends' or both. 'Obstruction of justice' was one of several serious allegations against Richard Nixon, leading to articles of impeachment, eventually his ignominious resignation.

Certainly, the crime of 911 should have been investigated while the trail was still warm; a legitimate President would have ordered it, insisted upon it. The trail has grown cold, an outcome desired by an administration that opposed the creation of a 911 commission and put limits on it as a condition of its creation!
The evidence includes the unprecedented nature of what happened that day, the eyewitness testimonies of people present at the site, and the physical evidence demonstrated by photographs and videos. 1, 2 Evidence for explosives is also given through proof by contradiction in that seven years of ever-changing government reports could not provide a non-explosive story for destruction of the WTC buildings. 3, 4, 5 More recently, peer-reviewed scientific papers show that energetic materials were present at the WTC, as indicated by the environmental data and the dust from Ground Zero. 6, 7, 8

The forensic investigation of explosions typically aims to determine who had the means, opportunity and motive to accomplish the explosive event. 9 When that approach is taken with the WTC, we can see that those who had the greatest means and opportunity also had the greatest motive. For example, we've seen that certain tenant companies that occupied the WTC towers not only had the opportunity, but they also had the means in terms of access and expertise, to place explosives in the buildings. 10 We also know that the security companies that were responsible for planning and implementing the security plan for the towers, after the 1993 bombing, appeared to have benefited from the attacks. 11 Additionally, the companies reviewed were connected to each other through certain powerful people and organizations, and had all done major work for the Saudi Arabian government.

--KEVIN RYAN, Demolition Access to the WTC Towers: Part Four - Cleanup
In the days and weeks following 911, Bush ordered the destruction of 911 evidence --on its face obstruction of justice!
Other than subsection 1512(c), there are three federal statutes which expressly outlaw the destruction of evidence in order to obstruct justice: 18 U.S.C. 1519 prohibits destruction of evidence in connection with federal investigation or bankruptcy proceedings, 18 U.S.C. 1520 prohibits destruction of corporate audit records, and 18 U.S.C. 2232(a) prohibits the destruction of property to prevent the government from searching or seizing it.

None of the three are RICO or money laundering predicate offenses.334 There are no explicit statements of extraterritorial jurisdiction for any of them, but the courts are likely to conclude that overseas violation of their provisions are subject to prosecution in this country. None of them feature an individual conspiracy component, but all of them are subject to general federal law governing conspiracy, principals, accessories after the fact, and misprision.335 Obstruction of Investigations by Destruction of Evidence (18 U.S.C. 1519). Where subsection 1512(c) condemns obstruction of federal proceedings by destruction of evidence, Section 1519 outlaws obstruction of federal investigations or bankruptcy proceedings by such means. Section 1519’s language suggests that it reaches only executive branch investigations and does not extend to Congressional investigations or judicial investigations such as those conducted by a federal grand jury. It declares:
    Whoever knowingly alters, destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, falsifies, or makes a false entry in any record, document, or tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence the investigation or proper administration of any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States or any case filed under title 11, or in relation to or contemplation of any such matter or case, shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years, or both.
Although its “relation to or contemplation of” clause may admit to more than one construction, the section’s elements might be displayed as follows:
I. Whoever II. knowingly III. A. alters, B.destroys, C. Mutilates

-- Obstruction of Justice: an Overview of Some of the Federal Statutes that Prohibit Interference with Judicial, Executive, or Legislative Activities
The Bush conspiracy theory of 911 is shot-through with holes, unexplained anomalies and outright lies. Certainly, a definitive list of every falsehood, every distortion, every misstatement is beyond the scope of any article I might put on this blog. What may be done, however, is to categorize them --the three most obvious and fatal holes, the three legs without which the tripod will not stand.

A 757 did NOT crash into the Pentagon!

Johnny Cochran said: "If it does not fit, you must acquit!" Likewise, if there is no wreckage, the Bush cover story falls apart. Similarly, if there is no wreckage traceable to a 757, then you must discard the Bush official conspiracy theory. The house of cards has already collapsed.

If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, the wings would have been found on the Pentagon lawn. They were never found!

If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, two huge titanium/steel alloy engine rotors, each about 12-15 ft in diameter, would have been recovered; they were, after all, designed to withstand the intense heat inside jet engines. Those rotors were never found.

If a 757 had crashed the Pentagon, wreckage totaling about 60 to 80 tons would have been recovered, and, as was the case at Lockerbie and every other airliner crash, re-assembled as a part of a real investigation. Upon orders from George W. Bush no such investigation was ever undertaken.

Only one engine compressor rotor was found. It is about one third the size of each of two rotors that would have been found had a 757 crashed the Pent. High rez photos of this single rotor are available on the intenet.

It is --however --just about the right size to have been left behind by a U.S. Global Hawk, a payload carrying missile that was, in fact, flown from the west coast to Australia (where it was landed) all completely by remote control. [The U.S. Global Hawk, at right, painted to look like an AA airliner]

If Arab hijackers were known by name and additionally 'known' to have been on board Flt 77, it is reasonable to conclude, therefore, that they were autopsied as were other victims. In fact, there are no Arab names whatsoever on the only official, admissible document relating to the crash of Flt 77: the official autopsy report.

What about a passenger list? It proves nothing; anyone can type up a list of names at any time, even after the fact. If, as the Washington Post reported, Hani Hanjour did not have a ticket, how did he get on board? What evidence is there that any hijacker at any time ever boarded any aircraft that was said to have been connected with 911.

Bottom line: there is absolutely no evidence that Hani Hanjour or any alleged 911 hijacker ever got on board Flight 77. None! No wonder Bushco was reluctant to press this case. No wonder Bushco overtly obstructed justice! No wonder Bushco seemed overly eager to shut everyone up! They succeeded in doing so because the GOP has a horrible record with respect to public education and because the U.S. media is concentrated in very, very few hands. Last time I checked, American mass media was concentrated in the hands of about six or seven huge corporations. These corporations are not likely to expose the murderous hoax that was 911.

The wings and tail are huge surfaces areas --certainly bigger than the tiny hole said by official conspiracy theorists to have been the impact point! The hole would not have accommodated the fuselage, let alone the wings and tail which might have broken off to be found on the lawn. Nor was there any significant damage that might have been attributed to either wings or tail section or both. Neither was there evidence of wings or tail section!

There was a 'punch out' hole in the inner ring but could not have been made by a 757! Oddly, there is apparently no debris remaining of whatever it was that made the punch-out hole in the inner ring. I am quite sure that whatever it was, Bush ordered that it be carted off and destroyed.

Even if the plane had 'shredded' --as some have claimed --'80 tons of plane is still 80 tons of debris'.
"Wings that should have been sheared off by the impact are entirely absent. There is also substantial evidence of debris from a much smaller jet-powered aircraft inside the building. We conclude with a high degree of certainty that no Boeing 757 struck the building. We also conclude with a substantial degree of certainty that a smaller, single-engined aircraft, roughly the size and shape of an F-16, did, in fact, strike the building."

(Source)

Detailed analysis of the debris field, physical damage, and other factors in the alleged impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building on the morning of September 11, 2001 reveals an almost complete absence of debris expected from such an event. (Elliott 2003) The initial (pre-collapse) hole made by the alleged impact on the ground floor of Wedge One of the building is too small to admit an entire Boeing 757. In order to decide whether or not a Boeing 757 (or aircraft of comparable size) struck the Pentagon on the morning in question, a comprehensive review of all the debris and other physical evidence is hardly necessary. It turns out that a study of the wings alone suffices for the purpose.

...

The analysis presented here is based entirely on standard and/or official sources, such as the engineering report issued under the auspices of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), as directed by an army engineering officer as chair. (ASCE 2003)

--The Missing Wings, A Comparison of actual and expected wing debris resulting from the impact of a Boeing 757 on the Pentagon building (revised Dec 19, 2004), A. K. Dewdney, G. W. Longspaugh

We are lead to believe that not only did the 757 penetrate the outer wall, but continued on to penetrate separate internal walls totaling 9 feet of reinforced concrete. The final breach of concrete was a nearly perfectly cut circular hole (see left) in a reinforced concrete wall, with no subsequent damage to the rest of the wall. (If we are to believe that somehow this aluminum aircraft did in fact reach this sixth final wall.)

--A Boeing 757 did not hit the Pentagon, Michael Meyer, Mechanical Engineer

No wreckage traceable to a 757 was ever recovered at the Pentagon. Something was carted off surreptitiously under a blue tarpaulin but I doubt seriously that the four or five white-shirted wimps were toting some 60 to 80 tons of wreckage that would have been left behind by a crashed 757. Whatever they were carrying 1) it's origin would not be revealed; 2) it was light enough to carried aloft by several skinny guys in pristine white shirts; 3) it could not possibly have come from a 757.

Bushco efforts to confront and/or confound critics of the Pentagon crash are increasingly ludicrous. The fuselage of Flt 77, they say, vaporized. Any reputable engineering department and any reputable engineering website will confirm the fact that the Aluminum will not vaporize at temperatures less than 11000 degrees F. NASA is on record stating that 11000 degrees F is 1000 degrees hotter than the surface of the Sun! At the same time, Bushco defenders say that both passengers and hijackers were DNA identified. But DNA literally 'melts' (the term used in the scientific literature) at various temps between about 400 to 500 degrees F.

Now --if the temperatures were sufficient to vaporize the airliner fuselage, no DNA tests would have been possible. Simply, either the fuselage vaporized or the DNA tests were made. Bushco advocates cannot have it both ways. I only cite this as an example of the ludicrous extremes to which defenders of the official conspiracy theory have devolved, what extremes and contradictions they are willing to embrace to defend what is clearly several acts of high treason and mass murder that any reasonable, intelligent person will conclude was ordered and supervised by Bush, his administration and his co-conspirators in private industry, the Military-Industrial Complex and, quite possibly, the so-called 'Jewish Lobby'.

Aluminum Does Not Penetrate Hardened Steel

The criminals who perpetrated 911 exploit GOP subversions of education, especially the Bush/Perry regimes in Texas. When crimes of the magnitude of 911 are committed, it is only the GOP which benefits from its neglect of education, especially science, physics, logic, skepticism.

Only a controlled demolition looks like a controlled demolition. And WTC 7 looks like a controlled demolition because it was 'pulled' just as Silverstein himself said it was. And if it was 'pullled', it had to have been 'prepped', that is, explosives planted and wired perhaps weeks in advance of the so-called 'terrorist attacks'.

There is --in fact --not a shred of evidence to support the ludicrous theory that it fell as a result of piddly random fires that might have been pissed out!
For those who are not yet ready to make the commitment to obtain and read a book on 9/11, but who wish to learn more, a ten-minute solution is available. It only takes a few minutes to view video on the Internet of the collapse of Building 7, the 47 story skyscraper located immediately north of the WTC complex about 300 feet from the North Tower. Viewers will note the almost vertical collapse of the building. Only controlled demolitions have achieved vertical collapses of upright steel structures.

After viewing the video, many will agree with Dan Rather who said on CBS News that very evening that the collapse of Building 7 was “reminiscent of those pictures we’ve all seen too much on television before when a building was destroyed by well placed dynamite to knock it down.”

--Ronald Bleier, WTC Building 7 – The 911 Smoking Gun?
I deny that there is any credible evidence to support the theory that an airliner with a soft aluminum body could or can penetrate the dense steel outer 'cladding' of the WTC. And --if by a miracle it did --it most certainly could not have penetrated the dense inner core conveniently omitted from 'official theories'! This 'omission' is not competent if by accident; it is a crime if the omission is deliberate! In any case, it's existence disproves the official lies.

Purdue University 'Forgot' About a Dense Core at WTC

The most notorious instance of omission of this core is a You Tube video which claims to have been produced by Purdue University. The 'copy' on You Tube claims to be 'realistic' and 'factual' but, in fact, is neither! It depicts a soft-bodied aluminum airliner slicing through the dense steel cladding. In the version I watched, the CORE had been omitted entirely, a case of 'truth by animation'. I deny that this 'toon is realistic or factual. I challenge Purdue to cite a single peer-reviewed paper in which soft aluminum has penetrated hardened steel at any speed. Show me the science and spare me the 'toons.

I carry a Swiss army knife. The blades are made of hardened steel --not Aluminum. That's because Aluminum is not likely to penetrate anything that I might want to cut. Soft Aluminum airliner bodies, likewise, were never designed to penetrate hard, dense steel and 911 is most certainly not the test case that proves it does, will or ever has. Since the Wright brothers aircraft of any sort have been made of lighter weight and softer materials. Airliners are not made of hard, dense steel but aluminum --lighter, less dense, softer. Wenger and Victorinox are not likely to begin the manufacture of aluminum bladed Swiss Army knives any time soon.

Defenders of Bush's ludicrous weird, witch doctor science, however, have an 'explanation'. They say that 'kinetic energy' allows soft aluminum to penetrate hard steel!

Nonsense!

They have watched too many roadrunner cartoons in which the wily coyote falls off a cliff, penetrates the hard ground leaving a hole in the shape of his silhouette! The real world is not a Road Runner 'toon nor is it a fantasy of Purdue under-graduates.

The truth is that gains in kinetic energy are absorbed by the softer body. In this case, a real airliner striking a tough steel cladding would have been shredded, those parts striking the hard steel would absorb the increased kinetic energy due to velocity and would literally fold up; those pieces striking spaces between the steel columns would penetrate only the empty spaces. Were the building solid steel, the soft Al body would simply fold up and fall down to street level.

Try hurling a ball of modeling clay at a metal garage door. If you are Mickey Mantle reincarnated you might knock down the door if it is merely propped up or poorly attached. But you will never, ever penetrate the door itself. Try it! There is no record of anyone penetrating a metal garage door with a ball of non-hardening modeling clay.

Another experiment. Replace the lead slug of a 30 caliber round with one of aluminum. Fire that round at a steel beam comparable to those at the WTC. Let me know if it ever penetrates the steel! Lotsa luck! I don't expect to hear from anyone performing this experiment nor will I ever read a 'peer-reviewed' paper validating such an experiment.

Soft aluminum fuselages, likewise, will never slice through the girders themselves as the official conspiracy suggests or states.


Condo LIES to Congress

If the official conspiracy theory of 911 were true, then Condo Rice would have had no motive to lie to Congress.

By the time I saw 'ground zero' for myself, every scrap had been carted off! I peered into a deep and pristine hole! An individual cannot cover up his/her crimes on this scale. But Bushco --his administration of fellow crooks like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld --covered up the crime of 911 in 'full view of the world'. The American 'sheeple' bought it!

Instead, Shermer has discounted Bush critics as 'conspiracy theorists' despite the fact that the official theory puts forward a weird and highly unlikely conspiracy involving 19 Arab hijackers who were, we are told, coordinated from deep inside a cave in Tora Bora. It was a bad re-write of the old Popeye cartoon: 'Ali Baba and his 40 Thieves'.

The official conspiracy theory thus meets Conan Doyle's standard by which bunkum and bullshit is exposed and assessed. Every key point in the theory is utterly impossible. Nothing in the official story is possible or plausible. It could not and did not happen. It is a lie, a cruel and tragic hoax. It was, in fact, an act of high treason in which officials of 'our' government conspired to wage war upon and murder citizens of the United States.

In summary: to believe the official conspiracy theory, you must discount or ignore numerous laws of elementary, high school physics:
  1. You must believe that kerosene fires will melt steel though this has never happened or been duplicated in a lab.
  2. You must believe that Hani Hanjour can duplicate for real Criss Angel's most famous 'trick' --that of walking through solid glass or, better, David Copperfield who walked through the Great Wall of China.
I know how Copperfield pulled it off but --you have to admit --there were more witnesses to his feat than there were witnesses to Bush's 911. And when Copperfield walked through the Great Wall no life was sacrificed for the sake of mere illusion or worse --control of world oil supplies!

Let's consider a few of these anomalies that render the official theory not only impossible but ludicrous. The belief in it should embarrass anyone claiming to be a skeptic, humiliate any 'scientist' failing to point out the astronomically improbable succession of miracles that are required for such a thing to happen.

To believe Bushco's 'not ready for Vegas' routine:
  1. You must believe that a 757 can crash into the Pentagon and disappear without a trace.
  2. You must believe that soft aluminum can penetrate hard steel despite the fact that if that were so Wenger would make the blades of its Swiss Army knives of Aluminum.
  3. You must believe that for some weird and un-recorded reason airlines decided to press into service flights that had not been scheduled to fly (mothballed) for some six months.
  4. You must believe that Arab hijackers were either 'raptured' or jumped out of Flt 77; there are absolutely no Arab names on the official autopsy report.
  5. You must believe the aluminum body of a 757 vaporized as no scrap traceable to an airliner of any sort was ever found at the Pentagon.
  6. You must believe that Hani Hanjour got on board without a ticket and without creating any kind of suspicion prior to his boarding. Perhaps he made himself invisible!
  7. You must believe that Hani Hanjour, like David Copperfield, walked through a closed door! NTSB data released via an FOIA proves that the cabin door was never opened during the flight. How did Hani get in? For that matter --how did he get on board? There is, in fact, no evidence whatsoever that he did! Nor is his name or the names of any other 'terrorist/Arab' to be found on the only official list of passengers --the OFFICIAL autopsy report.
  8. You must believe that Flt 77 managed to manifest itself in two places at the same instant: NTSB puts Flt 77 at some 200 ft above the Pentagon at the time of impact.
  9. You must believe that because no fuselage traceable to a 757 was ever found at the Pentagon, it must have 'vaporized' in the heat.
  10. You must believe that the source of that heat was greater than that on the surface of the sun itself --some 10000 degrees F.
And while believing that the fuselage vaporized, you must also believe that victims were DNA identified. But --how is that possible? DNA literally melts at varying temps between about 400 to 500 degrees F.

So --which is it? Were they DNA ID'd? Or did the Aluminum fuselage vaporize?

Which is it?


It cannot be both ways! In fact, it is neither! This merely proves how utterly ludicrous is this theory and more so because seemingly 'intelligent' people believe this utter crap!

Silverstein had Method, Motive and Opportunity.

About New York --WTC 7 was not struck by airliners; yet its collapse was reported by the BBC before it occurred. But why did it collapse? It was prepared well in advance as any CD expert will tell you is required. Who else but Silverstein could have taken out the insurance policy on this property?

If WTC 7 Was a Controlled Demolition, so were the Twins!

Silverstein is even on video saying that he gave the order to pull it! Indeed --it was pulled immediately upon his order. That means that the building had been prepped, perhaps, for weeks. I would like to have read his policy. What, precisely, was covered? Was the building ensured against deliberate controlled demolition. If so, he could have ordered it 'pulled' at any time at his convenience. I doubt any company would write such a blank check. The policy, I am quite sure, covered 'acts of God' --but 'terrorism'? Perhaps! It most certainly would not have covered a fraudulent act of deliberate demolition for the purpose of collecting the insurance money. There is a term for that: INSURANCE FRAUD! As I recall, his insurance policy was worth $billions$ which have by now, I am sure, been paid.
I consider the many falsehoods of the official report. I disregard the official theory and start from scratch. At the end, I make a number of conclusions, most notably the assertion that no hijackers participated.

I rely upon Bureau of Transportation Statistics (BTS) records, which indicate clearly that two of the flights associated with 9/11, United 175 and United 93, were scheduled to fly that day and that the other two flights, American 11 and American 77, were not scheduled.

The BTS records are half of the key to determining where the planes went. The other half is the proof that none of the targets (World Trade Centers One and Two, the Pentagon and Shanksville) were struck by any planes resembling the ones allegedly used for these four flights. The following are a series of if-then propositions that I constructed as to the planes and passengers and my reasoning for using the assumptions that I made: IF Flights 11 and 77 were not scheduled, then neither 11 nor 77 flew

It would be unlikely for plotters to use planes that were not scheduled to be used on September 11th. Of course the plotters could have arranged to use unscheduled flights, but how would the passengers have learned of them without being suspicious or without being involved?

Plotters could have had the idea that controlling two planes was much easier than controlling four. They may then have decided to pretend that two other flights were used by using false ³ blips´ on the Federal Aviation Administration computer screens, by taking advantage of simulations going on throughout the east coast (including Delta 89, now widely thought to be a simulated flight used to distract from others) and by faking phone calls from planes that did not fly.

IF passengers actually went on flights, then the passengers may be accounted for I have yet to see any proof of tickets bought by the alleged passengers, boarding passes or videotape from surveillance of any of the airports where the alleged passengers left from. Furthermore, no independent expert has ever verified any remains of any of the alleged passengers at any of the ³crash sites.´

And, the phone calls associated with the flights could have been handled by a few passengers, or even by voice ³morphing.´ A low number of passengers are on the Social Security Death Index. The best evidence of passengers actually flying on any of the planes in question, interestingly, comes from eyewitness accounts of passengers at the Cleveland Airport that morning.

My First Conclusion: The Official Theory Is False

Like most people, I did not question whether planes were used in the events of 9/11 when I heard the news. I doubt the idea crossed my mind for a long time. In all of the news, much was made of the flight numbers, specific passengers and the constant image on television screens of a plane striking the south tower.
But after researching the matter, I discovered that official story simply had too many holes in it to be accurate. The following contains a partial list of problems

-- Misdirection: Following the Plot, Execution and Cover-up of 9/11 Crimes
By Dean T. Hartwell
Back to Michael Shermer.

The above outline of absurdities re: 911 should have been taken up by real skeptics. That Michael Shermer took up the task of defending myth, lies, absurdities and anti-science, speaks volumes.

Shermer built his career upon the conflict between creationism and evolution, light work for anyone with a normal IQ. Making fools of people like Sarah Palin is hardly a challenge for anyone capable of graduating 9th grade. Shermer tripped up with regard to 911 because he failed to abide by the only dictum which defines true skepticism: those who assert must prove! Shermer failed the very first task of the skeptic and that is: demand proof! At the very least --evidence!

A review charged that Shermer 'offers very little in the way of direct evidence against creationism'! It is not the job of a skeptic to offer evidence against anything! It is the job of the skeptic to doubt, question and challenge. It is the job of the skeptic to demand proof and evidence for the absurd, outlandish, outrageous conspiracy theory that was promoted by the Bush administration. It is also the job of the skeptic to ask of those who peddle theories: who benefits if we buy this crap? Why and how do they benefit?

Those who assert must prove

I challenge Bush's supporters to prove their assertions. Those peddling or putting forward theories must be prepared to prove and/or support them with demonstrable fact. Bushco has never proven anything with regard to 911. Ergo: there is no reason to support or believe him or anything said by anyone in his administration. Bush supporters not only cannot prove, they have no evidence that supports the official theory. It's utter bunkum from the get go.

Again --Doyle's character --Sherlock Holmes --said:

"When you have eliminated the impossible whatever remains however implausible must be the truth!"
Sadly, millions of Americans believe a pack of lies because they just 'can't handle the truth!"


17 comments:

Anonymous said...

Dov Zakheim is the real 911 mastermind. Read all about him. Cheney was involved, others were involved, but Bush may have been deliberately left out of the loop. He did however engage in the cover-up obviously.

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

Dov Zakheim is the real 911 mastermind. Read all about him. Cheney was involved, others were involved, but Bush may have been deliberately left out of the loop

I don't disagree with those specifics but as Harry said: "The buck stops here.." Bush is as guilty of 911 as Hitler was responsible for the Holocaust and atrocities. Sure --he was a TOOL but but a willing tool, the kind that results from a Faustian bargain with old scratch. After all, he was the son of the one of the most EVIL Macheivellian manipulators in world history --Bush Sr whom I knew.

Anonymous said...

Jeez I just read about the Dov Z. guy, damn that's crazy.

It's been a while since I've read it but what about 'Collateral Damage'? I thought that was the best thing I ever read about 9/11 as far as motives behind it. So much detail.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/4866520/Collateral-Damage-911-Covert-Ops-Funding-Targeted

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

It's been a while since I've read it but what about 'Collateral Damage'?

No excuses --but just couldn't get everything in a short article. As it is, this is rather long by most blog standards. It is, rather, more of outline. Much more detail can be written of each bullet point. And Flt 93 gets short shrift here though it is another BIG and FATAL hole in the official bullshit theory.

Anonymous said...

Understood, but Zakheim and his ilk must not get a free pass. The real 9/11 perps, including Silverstein,Dominic Suter and Dov Zakheim would be just fine with the buck stopping at Bush and not getting to the real architects.

And you knew Bush Sr.personally? That must have been creepy. I'm sure you know all about his dealings with Carlyle and the Bin Laden family. I would bet that Poppy Bush was more "in the know" about 9/11 than W. Did you ever get a chance to ask him about his whereabouts when JFK was killed? I know his answer has never been consistent. Very evil guy.

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

And you knew Bush Sr.personally? That must have been creepy.

Indeed! Creepy in a sort of "Invasion of the Body Snatchers" way. See: http://vaquero.blip.tv/file/1411433/

Sr was flat, dead-panned, no personality of any sort. A human robot, or worse, an alien 'seed pod' in a human body.

He told me how he was 'duped' into eating dog meat in the Forbidden City (in advance of Nixon's visit) What he did not say was that he puked on his host as he, in fact, did much later upon the lap of the Japanese Prime Minister.

Sr was flat, dull (probably dull-witted), nasal, stiff as a board, utterly lacking what we human beings have chosen to call a "sense of humor" or "personality".

Sadly, I never got the chance to get into the JFK assassination with him. Have regretted not being more aggressive. Since then, I have become convinced that the famous photo is --indeed --Sr photographed hanging around the front of the TSBD. Had I had that photo at the time, I most certainly would have confronted him with it and risked being awakened by goons in the middle of the night. It was only a few years after the JFK murder when that photo was taken that I met Sr for the first time.

Anonymous said...

Ah yes, "the photo". It certainly looks like him to me, its just ashame its so grainy and low quality. Wish it could be enhanced somehow. Where does that photo come from anyway? Or rather, who found it years later and put it out?

Poppy Bush showed how concerned he is when he took the opportunity at Fords funeral to strangely praise his role in the Warren Commission and condemn "conspiracy theorists". What a weird and creepy moment that was. I already suspected his role but that sealed it for me.

I think Bush Sr. clearly played a role in the Reagan attempted hit too. The Hinckley and Bush families are connected, coincidence or more? I think its obvious. Of course they didn't have to kill Reagan, he did what he was told from there on out like the empty suit coward he was.

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

Ah yes, "the photo". It certainly looks like him to me, its just a shame its so grainy and low quality.

Well, it is grainy. I have looked for larger, higher rez versions that I could enhance in Photoshop. Even so --it is clear: it's him. The dead give-aways are 1) the hairline which is seen sharp enough to match up precisely on much higher rez photos of Bush head from almost precisely the same angle. The 'hair-line' is almost as distinctive as a fingerprint but has the dis-advantage of changing over the years. In this case, the higher rez photo is of a much young Satan..uh..Senior Bush.

Another give-away is the 'slouch'. I have seen Sr stand JUST as he is standing (slouching) in the TSBD photo. That's how he held himself. It's a dead give-away.

More tip-offs are the jawline and nose. Exact match up.

With a higher rez of the original, I could produce a very high-contrast, nearly silhouette of his body on which a 'skeleton' could be 'super-imposed'. In turn, this could derive 3-D skeleton models against which ANY NUMBER of more recent and much high rez photos could be match precisely.

It is not a good photo --but, with a bit of work --could produce a MATCH that might be accepted as evidence in any court in which his presence in Dealy is material to the charges against him.

I think Bush Sr. clearly played a role in the Reagan attempted hit too. The Hinckley and Bush families are connected, coincidence or more? I think its obvious.

Indeed! I have not gotten off into the Hinckly connections, preferring to focus like a laser on more obviously vulnerable weaknesses, JFK murder being one such instance. My take on the JFK murder is that it is a 'botched job'. Amateurish. The CIA gets too much credit. The holes in the JFK 'hit' are so huge that it has only been the sheer muscle and body count that has kept the lid on it.

Likewise --911! Only the complicity of the corporate owned media has kept the lid on this ABSOLUTELY BOTCHED JOB!

But what does it say of the intelligence of the American people that we are RULED, even intimidated, by the GANG THE COULD NOT SHOOT STRAIGHT?!

Anonymous said...

Len Hart said "No excuses...short article"

Well sh*t you did a damn goood job in a short space. Good on ya to keep the issue alive. I just wonder if in 20 years the 'official' conspiracy theory will be seen as pure much bullsh*t by as many people ala JFK assassination. Does ANYBODY believe the magic bullet theory nowadays? I just hope 9/11 isn't relegated to the same kind of footnote-in-history curiosity. Time will tell. Keep up the good work LH I always did like your blog.

Unknown said...

Anonymous said..

I just wonder if in 20 years the 'official' conspiracy theory will be seen as pure much bullsh*t by as many people ala JFK assassination.

That's why we have to keep the issue alive. 'They' count on new generations NOT having a clue. It is scary that it's been almost a decade since 911. SHRUB must believe he is home free.

Unknown said...

The following comment was posted by John Niems on FB in response to my article:

"GREAT WORK LEN! I concur on all points! I listened to the debate with Richard Gage and the GATE KEEPER Dave Thomas! He put his foot in his mouth when he said and I am paraphrasing: "The TOWERS would not have come down if the fires were put ...out immediately after the planes hit the TOWERS!" The fires were already out! He just told the WORLD that yes EXPLOSIVES BROUGHT THE TOWERS DOWN! There were little to no fires as most of the jet fuel went outside the building after impact so his trying to cover up the cover up is debunked by his own words! Also if it wasn't for the 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT BUILDING 7 would have already been forgotten as THE 9/11 COMMISSION never once mentions BUILDING 7 and NIST did so reluctantly after the 9/11 TRUTHERS would not let up and then LIED repeatedly as to what happened! Every 9/11 TRUTHER should never forget too what was inside BUILDING 7 is the REASON FOR IT COMING DOWN! There were important FBI_CIA_SEC_ENRON FILES inside that had to be destroyed to end the CASES that were pending and all FILES that the FBI and CIA needed to be destroyed that were what they both wanted to go away! MAYOR RUDY'S COMMAND CENTER also was on the 23rd FLOOR and that should have used on 9/11 and protocol called for it to be that day but they had already abandoned the building as it too had to be destroyed as RUDY had to know 7 was coming down as well!" --John Niems

Unknown said...

The following is my response to John:

EXCELLENT point...indeed, the stupid f_cker just let the cat out of the bag. Indeed, the mere kerosene fires were spent within minutes. If the tower had not fallen at that point, they were NOT going to fall.

This is the price we pay for neglecting science in school.

1) jet fuel can burn all day long and NEVER weaken steel at all

2) but the WTC fires were spent by the time the black smoke started belching out.

As a hard-bitten reporter, I learned that a fire is 'spent' when the white smoke turns black.

At WTC, the smoke turned black within minutes. 3) unless there is a NEW source of energy, HEAT DOES NOT BUILD UP over time. Apparently the criminals who pulled this off had never bothered to learn about the SECOND LAW OF THERMODYNAMICS!

Building 7 was a real fuck up for the TRAITOROUS MASS MURDERS who pulled it off. There is PROBABLE CAUSE to arrest Silverstein right now.

He should be indicted for insurance fraud, collecting billions for blowing up his own fucking building. How many died in WTC 7? Silverstein not only conspired by TRAITORS and mass murderers, he IS one.

Then there is the case of Marvin Bush --in charge of 'security' for WTC. HOW BLOODY CONVENIENT!

By law --ANY Federal Judge can convene a FEDERAL GRAND JURY upon his/her own motion. What we need to do is to find a COMPETENT and HONEST JUDGE and a competent lawyer to help us write the petition.

A Federal Grand Jury can subpoena the lot of these lying bastards, put them in front of a GRAND JURY so that we can sort out the lies, add PERJURY and OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE to the long list of capital murders, high treason, seditious treason and numerous other federal offenses that may be charged Bush Jr, Marvin Busn, Silverstein, Rummie, Mayor Rudy, Cheney, possibly the entire JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF.

Do you know any Federal Judges? Do you know anyone who knows a federal judge?

Jacob. said...

Hi Len,

" But what does it say of 'the intelligence of the American People, that we are RULED, even intimidated, by the GANG THAT COULD NOT SHOOT STRAIGHT!?" end quote.

The exellent article by Bill Noxid; " Enough of the Myth of the American Morality " - " Awakening the Global Slave ", wich like your, " 911 Inside Job Chronicles ", keeps on repeating the knowledge of facts about the greatest (9/11) crime in contemporary world-History! Is (I think) 'a must read'.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article26234.htm

Anyhoo, good to see you riding your existentialist-Texan-blog-horse with such fervor again!

And, as far as it go's here in Europe (and in The Netherlands, where I'm from) one could say; " But what does it say about the intelligence of the European and Double Dutch People!?"

It feels 'new testament biblical' in terms that Satan is back on Earth to Reign, not that I'm religious persé, but just to emphasize the totality of evil as perpetrated by the Corporate and Political Humanoid-Elites, the eternal scumbags so to say.

As an Positive inclined Human-Being as I'm proud to aknowledge myself, even when aware that the current human time/history is ink-black due to the crimes against humanity by the Bush sr.'s and the likes of his ilk, it's imperative to see and understand that in the (human-historical) end, there's always the life-loving counter movement of the (mostly) common-people with compassion for one an-other. They feel instinctively, and are intuitionaly motivated to seek the deeper and beautifull sense of (human) life in finding and preserving truth in themselves and in the greater, more complex cultural-paradigms of life in a (Global)society.

The EVIL may deny the truth, yet they cannot alter it!

Keep on going you crazy diamonds!

Jacob.

Unknown said...

Jacob. said...

Anyhoo, good to see you riding your existentialist-Texan-blog-horse with such fervor again!

Thanks, Jacob. Great to hear from you again.

It feels 'new testament biblical' in terms that Satan is back on Earth to Reign, not that I'm religious persé, but just to emphasize the totality of evil as perpetrated by the Corporate and Political Humanoid-Elites, the eternal scumbags so to say.

The analogy is certainly valid though I remain agnostic re: theology. 'Evil' --according to Dr. Gustav Gilbert who 'interviewed' and studied Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg --is the utter 'lack of empathy'. Jung described the folk in similar words and ventured that as much as 30 percent of every population are precisely that --certifiably psychopathic, utterly lacking empathy, often delusional an prepared to embrace any claptrap that helps them 'feel good about themselves'.

That precisely describes the GOP in the U.S. and the 'right wing' even in 'neutral', peaceful nations like Switzerland.

The EVIL may deny the truth, yet they cannot alter it!

One hopes!

The power of electronic media, however, is worrisome. I referenced Criss Angel and David Copperfield. The electronic 'media' killed the 'art' of magic, slight of hand, card tricks et al. Because ANY THING can be animated, faked and or 'duplicated' via TV and/or video coupled with network or cable distribution, 'magic tricks' are no longer impressive unless seen up close, in person.

911 was, bluntly, an ILLUSION made possible by TV as were Criss Angel's voyage through a wall and Copperfields' trip through the Great Wall of China. The difference between innocent 'magic' and a 'cruel hoax' is the body count and the tyranny on the other side.

Jacob Bronowski wrote that there was but one morality following from the practice of science: "Behave in such a manner that what is true may be verified to be so!"

911 has proven that the mass electronic media will NOT liberate us my making the truth available to everyone. 911 has proven that when the 'media' is dominated by a handful of huge, venal corporations in partnership with the most visibly criminal regime in recent memory, the truth may become almost impossible to ascertain. Doyle's Holmes may be more important now than ever.

Again --thanks for your comments : ) Are you on FB? If so, let's be friends.

Anonymous said...

As to the hole in "C" ring, supposedly caused by the nose of "Flight 77," which wasn't even scheduled to fly on that date, it was caused by a backhoe.

If it had been caused by the nose of a 757, and there's nothing between "C" and "B" ring except air, then what would have kept it from slamming into the "B" ring?

Unknown said...

Anonymous said...

If it had been caused by the nose of a 757, and there's nothing between "C" and "B" ring except air, then what would have kept it from slamming into the "B" ring?

Certainly, of whatever origin, the so-called 'punch-out' hole was not the result of a 757. Secondly, your point is consistent with doubts about its being the result of a 'missile'. The MISSILE wreckage, most notably the SINGLE rotors from a U.S. Global Hawk, was photographed in high rez among debris on the Pentagon lawn. A REAL and OFFICIAL investigation would have made the Hawk origin of that single rotor a matter of public record, evidence in the mass murder and high treason trials that might still happen IF the U.S. public were 1) informed and 2) NOT apathetic.

Unknown said...

This is all very straight-forward: the Bush THEORY is a THEORY but a THEORY for which there is NO EVIDENCE and easily shown to be utterly impossible.

Anyone denying that Bush's theory is a theory is an idiot! It is a theory by definition.

Now --the next cultist who posts here, get deleted. This blog has had from its inception a very intelligent, astute readership.

Bush theorists need do just ONE thing: PROVE IT --or shut up!

I don't have time for and will not tolerate mere personal insults. If you don't like me, so what? Who gives a shit but you?